Rolling with the punches and doing your home work

A large part of workflow development is adapting to new problems as they come up.  Even the best made plans can quickly spiral towards catastrophe if just a single link in the chain breaks.  This happened to me not too long ago.

Skip back to about 18 months ago and the company I was with started transitioning to shooting entirely tapeless using Sony EX-1’s.  Along the way there were some bumps in the road but after refining our best practices and a couple of training sessions even our least tech savvy producers could reliably dump the contents of an SxS card, verify the transfer and wipe the card.  It’s pretty simple and it’s actually harder to screw up than it is to get it right.  Basically, keep the folder structure intact and all will be well.

Fast forward to a remote shoot three states away where a local crew was hired to cover a stand-up comedy show.  This was a bit larger budget than normal so they were actually able to hire a DIT (Digital Imaging Technician) to handle the media from the EX-1’s on location (as opposed to having a camera op, producer or PA do it).  This is normally a good thing because data management is a routine part of a DIT’s role.  I say “normally” because in this case the DIT screwed us.  Now, I don’t think the DIT set out to screw us but he screwed us none the less.  He had never worked EX-1’s before, which isn’t a sin, but he never educated himself on how to properly work with EX-1’s, which is a sin.

The first thing he did was he renamed the BPAV folder.  On Sony’s cameras that use the SxS cards there is a root folder named “BPAV” and all the camera files (both data and metadata) are stored within that folder.  When you transfer the contents off the card you can’t rename the BPAV folder and you have to keep the underlying folder structure in tact so that your software (in our case FCP 7 and Sony’s XDCAM Transfer Software) can properly read the contents of the folder.  Renaming the BPAV folder is more irritating than damaging because once you name it back everything is good to go.  The next problem though is more of a show stopper.

On a couple of the cards he just grabbed the folder that contained the MP4’s (the video files themselves) and that’s all.  Why?  I have no idea.  But that mistakes hurts a lot because without all the files that contain the metadata you are really up a creek.  Thankfully the DIT had a back-up.  Unfortunately the back-up was a mirror of the mistake-filled drive he gave us and the cards had all been wiped by this time.  Ugh.

After some research, and trial & error, I discovered that Premiere Pro in CS 5 could be used to read the MP4 files and convert them to ProRes (or whatever codec you use).  There is also software called MP4-EX Import made by Calibrated Software that will allow FCP to read the MP4 files natively.  I wouldn’t suggest editing with them natively, but this will give you the ability to transcode them into whatever codec you usually use.

So kids, the moral of the story is stay resilient, because the unexpected will happen, and to do your homework.  There’s nothing wrong with taking on something you haven’t tried before, but there is something wrong with being willfully ignorant in a day and age where access to information click away 24/7.

 

Posted in Editing, Post Production, Tips & Tricks | Leave a comment

4k sooner than I thought?

A few weeks ago if you would’ve asked my opinion about 4k I would’ve said that it’ll stay mainly in very hi-end acquisition but that’s about it for the foreseeable future.  HD as we know it was nearly a decade in the making and 1080p60 is still a rare bird let alone 4k.

That was until CES 2012 rolled around.

First off, at CES this year multiple consumer electronics companies showed off 4k displays that looked more showroom ready than prototypes wheeled out of a lab.  Second, Sony revealed a Blu-ray player that upscaled to 4k.  Finally, JVC released a prosumer 4k camera for $5,000.  JVC, if you may remember, was the first to get an HD prosumer camera out the door as well.  That’s when it dawned on me.  Consumer electronics makers need the next ‘it’ thing to keep selling gadgets and 3D, still mired by problems, isn’t catching on like they had hoped.  I don’t think they’ll be abandoning 3D efforts quite yet, but they seem to be priming the pump for 4k.

I think 4k will come to be in part the same way that HD came to be.  Consumer electronics companies will just start making 4k gadgets and start phasing out HD gadgets.  They phased out SD to force people into HD and I don’t see why they wouldn’t pull the same trick again.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying this is going to happen overnight but I think in another 5 years or so 4k will be fairly common.

Unlike the move from SD to HD (which was also burdened by the move from analog to digital) the move to 4k won’t have to rely on figuring out a way to cram 4k signals into devices that were originally designed to carry analog SD signals (like communications satellites in space).  IPTV, be it YouTube, Netflix or Hulu, is growing and only will continue to grow.  In 2005 YouTube launched with sub-SD quality videos, by 2008 it supported 1080p and in 2010 it supported 4k.  Imagine where we could be in 2017.  I mean, the broadband speeds of 10yrs ago are on par with 3G cellular speeds of today.

Of course there’s no certainty that broadband speeds will keep increasing like they have and the manufacturing costs of a 4k screen will have to come down substantially to hit a mainstream consumer price but I feel like this is going to happen.  In labs four layer Blu-ray discs have been created that have a capacity of 100gigs.  I’m sure those are a far cry away from being sold to the public at a cost effective price but the proof of concept is there.

Live sports was one of the big factors in HD adoption ( I’m not a pixel-peeper but even I get excited about sports in OTA HD) and that’s certainly a place that IPTV could struggle.  Broadcast distribution rights for major league sports is a multibillion dollar investment and traditional distributors that have ponied up the cash aren’t going to want to share which means we will have to rely on the broadcasters themselves to stream their own games.  NBC has been streaming its Sunday Night NFL game for a couple of years now and just recently streamed the Super Bowl to 2.1 million viewers.  Hopefully others take notice and we start seeing more simulcasts on the internet.

Overall, I don’t think broadcast is dead I just think the internet will become more and more of a viable alternative as time passes on.

Posted in Industry | Leave a comment

Golden Age of Corporate Video?

I read an interesting article at MarketingWeek.co.uk called Own-branded TV channels boost consumer engagement and that got me thinking that we might be entering a golden age of corporate video.

For many people, myself included, the term “corporate video” conjures up images of rather dry business-to-business talking heads and groan-inducing company training skits.   If a company wanted to talk directly to their customers /  potential customers they would need to make a commercial, buy ad time and hope that when their commercial aired at least some of the audience was their target demographic.

Now with the prevalence of  video streaming, companies aren’t limited to a 30 second long shot in the dark on broadcast or cable TV.  They are freed up to create everything from traditional 30 second spots to video guides showing people how to use their products and host this content either on sites like YouTube or their own servers.  This really opens the doors for how companies can use video to not only sell themselves but also educate their user base.

 

Posted in Industry | Leave a comment

iDevices, coming to a newsroom near you!

Leak shows Gannett stockpiling thousands of iPhones, iPads for journalists

I don’t think news departments are going to toss out all their full-sized cameras, but for ‘breaking news’ quick, dirty and mobile is most likely going to win the day more often than not.  If, for example, a reporter gets to the scene of a fire before the camera truck I wouldn’t be surprised to see live reporting courtesy of the iPhone’s FaceTime function.

Of course as a single journalist is required to do more and more what is going to suffer?  If a reporter is tasked with setting up the gear, making sure all the devices ‘see’ each other and that the up-link is stable will they have less time to asses the scene and find the story?  I don’t know, but as they saying goes, “there’s no such thing as a free lunch”.

Posted in Industry | Leave a comment

Good-bye cable box. Hello ‘Xbox 360 Mini’?

Xbox 360 live TV apps official: AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, more

Microsoft has made deals with TV providers like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast as well as individual channels such as HBO, Bravo and SyFy in their on-going effort to make the Xbox the digital hub for the living room.  Channel and show selection is still limited at this point but it’s progress none the less.  Assuming all goes according to plan the Xbox 360 could replace whatever set-top boxes customers currently receive from their cable/satellite/fiber provider.  That’s all well and good for a single TV but what about for multiple TVs?  Does Microsoft really think people will buy a 360 for each TV in the house?  I doubt it.

What I think MS has up their sleeve is a smaller, Kinect-enabled, TV/streaming-only box that can be used on other TVs in the household.  This ‘Xbox 360 Mini’ won’t play games, won’t function as a stand alone unit and will need to be slaved to a regular Xbox 360 via WiFi.  I think it will cost less than a regular 360 (maybe $99) and utilize the same Kinect-centric dashboard interface that the regular 360 has.  I don’t know what timetable Microsoft is thinking about but I know it won’t move any faster than the current TV gatekeepers (i.e. cable/satellite/fiber) will allow.

Posted in Industry, Video Games | Leave a comment

Avid to FCP to Color wasn’t too painful.

Recently I used Apple Color to color a couple of short corporate pieces that originated in Avid.  There’s more than one way to get from Avid into Color and the editor and I decided to go the AAF route as it would give us the most flexibility (even though it’s a bit more complicated course).  An alternative way would have been to export a QT and EDL from Avid and then load both of those into Color.  Color will take the EDL info and automatically ‘notch’ (add edit points) in all the right places on the QT.  While this approach is fairly straight forward it leaves you without handles in case you need to make any more tweaks after the fact and transitions between shots could be problematic.

Step one in making the AAF in Avid is to make sure the software is appropriately up to date.  The editor gave me a drive with all the media and Avid projects on it and I kept getting an error message when I tried to make the AAF.  Turns out Avid 5.5.3 is the only version approved to use on Mac OS 10.7 and I was using Avid 5.5.2.  Once I upgraded to 5.5.3 all was well.  The project was in 23.976 so I gave myself 48 frame handles just in case we needed them (better to be safe than sorry, IMO).

Step two in this process is to go to AutomaticDuck.com and download all the plugins (if you haven’t already).  The specific one you’ll need for this process is Pro Import FCP 2.0, but the plugins are very useful, and now free, so you might as well grab them all.  Once you have the plugin installed you just go File->Import->Automatic Duck Pro Import FCP, select the AAF from the dialog box and then let the Duck do its thing.  Basically Automatic Duck acts like a translator and, to the best of its ability, converts your Avid timeline into a FCP timeline.  How long and how accurate this process is depends on the amount of media there is and how many effects, transitions, filters, etc., you used.

The pieces I did were only a few minutes long each so the process went fairly quickly on the 2.4Ghz i7 MBP I was using.  Some of the Avid filters used had no FCP counterpart so they were discarded.  Wherever Automatic Duck encountered a problem though it left a marker in the FCP timeline along with a brief description of what the error was.  This is a very helpful feature.

With a working FCP version of the project I used the Media Manager to transcode it into ProRes (the source media was DNxHD) then sent it to Color.  After I was finished with the grade I sent it back to FCP and the editor decided to finish the piece in FCP as opposed to going through another conversion step to get it back into Avid.  The only things that didn’t make the initial Avid to FCP trip were some GFX and lower thirds and those were pretty simple to re-export from AE and drop into FCP.

This was the first time for both the editor and myself to do this process so we kinda bumbled around a few times before getting it right but now that I’ve got one under my belt I know that the next time will go much faster and smoother.

Posted in Avid, Final Cut Pro, Industry, Post Production, Workflow | Leave a comment

Louis C.K. tops $1 million in sales of $5 comedy special

Louis C.K. tops $1 million in sales of $5 comedy special

Not a bad haul at all and certainly another example of the best case scenario potential of self distribution.  Of course you still need talent, $250k for production costs, and a huge following to pull it off.  I’m curious to see if any other big comedians give this a shot.  I mean, why pay a middle man (whom apparently never cut Louis a royalty check) when you can have your audience pay you directly?

Posted in Industry | Leave a comment

We are way past ‘good enough’

What do the movies November, 28 Days later, Open Water and Murderball all have in common? They were all shot in DV and had theatrical releases.
That’s right, S-freakin’-D projected on the big screen for all to see! One of them, November, actually won Best Cinematography at Sundance.

From Canon’s T2i to Sony’s EX-1 to RED’s EPIC there is almost a glut of cameras across the whole spectrum. It looks like a filmmaker’s wet dream yet some people aren’t happy. The T2i doesn’t have good enough specs, the EX-1 doesn’t have interchangeable lenses and the EPIC is too expensive… Really? Cameras are dropping like manna from heaven yet some people only see a few reasons why they can’t use a specific camera instead of all the reasons why they can.

I guess that is the difference between the people that want to make films and the people that make films.

Posted in Industry | Leave a comment

Rolling with the punches and doing your homework

A large part of workflow development is adapting to new problems as they come up.  Even the best made plans can quickly spiral towards catastrophe if just a single link in the chain breaks.  This happened to me not too long ago.

Skip back to about 18 months ago and the company I was with started transitioning to shooting entirely tapeless using Sony EX-1’s.  Along the way there were some bumps in the road but after refining our best practices and a couple of training sessions even our least tech savvy producers could reliably dump the contents of an SxS card, verify the transfer and wipe the card.  It’s pretty simple and it’s actually harder to screw up than it is to get it right.  Basically, keep the folder structure intact and all will be well.

Fast forward to a remote shoot three states away where a local crew was hired to cover a stand-up comedy show.  This was a bit larger budget than normal so they were actually able to hire a DIT (Digital Imaging Technician) to handle the media from the EX-1’s on location (as opposed to having a camera op, producer or PA do it).  This is normally a good thing because data management is a routine part of a DIT’s role.  I say “normally” because in this case the DIT screwed us.  Now, I don’t think the DIT set out to screw us but he screwed us none the less.  He had never worked with EX-1’s before, which isn’t a sin, but he never educated himself on how to properly work with EX-1’s, which is a sin.

The first thing he did was he renamed the BPAV folder.  On Sony’s cameras that use the SxS cards there is a root folder named “BPAV” and all the camera files (both data and metadata) are stored within that folder.  When you transfer the contents off the card you can’t rename the BPAV folder and you have to keep the underlying folder structure in tact so that your software (in our case FCP 7 and Sony’s XDCAM Transfer Software) can properly read the contents of the folder.  Renaming the BPAV folder is more irritating than damaging because once you name it back everything is good to go.  The next problem though is more of a show stopper.

On a couple of the cards he just grabbed the folder that contained the MP4’s (the video files themselves) and that’s all.  Why?  I have no idea.  But that mistake hurts a lot because without all the files that contain the metadata you are really up a creek.  Thankfully the DIT had a back-up.  Unfortunately the back-up was a mirror of the mistake-filled drive he gave us and the cards had all been wiped by this time.  Ugh.

After some research, and trial & error, I discovered that Premiere Pro in CS 5 could be used to read the MP4 files and convert them to ProRes (or whatever codec you use).  There is also software called MP4-EX Import made by Calibrated Software that will allow FCP to read the MP4 files natively.  I wouldn’t suggest editing with them natively, but this will give you the ability to transcode them into whatever codec you usually use.

So kids, the moral of the story is stay resilient, because the unexpected will happen, and to do your homework.  There’s nothing wrong with taking on something you haven’t tried before, but there is something wrong with being willfully ignorant in a day and age where access to information is a click away 24/7.

 

Posted in Post Production, Workflow | Leave a comment

Netflix and the future of streaming

As I’m sure many of you have heard, Netflix stock has been plummeting since this summer’s Qwikster fiasco. The stock is currently trading in the mid-70’s and less than four months ago it was at a record high of about $300. Ouch. I would be surprised if the stock ever got that high again and I think the golden days of Netflix are in the rear view mirror. I’m not saying this because I think Netflix is doomed or anything that extreme, but the world of streaming premium content is changing and I don’t think Netflix will be able to attain such a lofty spot again amidst increased competition and costs.

At least one analyst, Michael Pachter, has predicted that the cost for Netflix to license content to stream could increase by a factor of ten as their current contracts with studios come up for renegotiation. Back when Netflix first started streaming it was a more experimental time but now it’s abundantly clear that streaming is going places.

On the competition front, Amazon is aggressively growing its streaming library and with the release of Kindle Fire is hopping to give customers a mobile, direct connection to a library of books, music, movies and TV shows. Hulu, even though its parent companies seem not entirely sure what do with it, is still the poster child for monetizing premium streaming content via ad revenue. The Hulu+ service also recently hit the 1 million subscriber mark, but that is still tiny compared to the nearly 24 million subscribers Netflix has. Finally, there is Apple and its AppleTV plus iTunes Store combination. Although the AppleTV has only attained ‘hobby’ status within the company this wouldn’t be the first time Apple came out of nowhere to steal the spot light.

If the old adage of competition being good for the customer holds true then the next few years stand to be pretty exciting ones for video streaming customers.

Posted in Industry | Leave a comment